Agent dossiers, the change log, the Registry, Blueprints, and the public API remain free. Skill authors may request a separately scoped review of their own repository when scanner output or remediation priorities need human interpretation.
Read agent change reports, browse indexed skills and MCP sources, inspect available evidence, follow upstream source, and use the public API.
A human review of available evidence for an authorized skill repository. This is remediation support—not a certificate, endorsement, trust mark, warranty, or requirement for editorial coverage.
A review may use available gitleaks, Semgrep, Trivy, provenance, source-path, revision, and content-hash evidence, followed by human interpretation.
It is not proof of universal safety or runtime behavior. Missing evidence, unavailable source, and untested claims are stated directly.
Team monitoring, recurring repository coverage, and continuous policy enforcement are not public products. Mr. Technology will not build or sell them without demonstrated demand and a separately verified operating model.
Ask a general question →No. Send the repository and the decision you need help making. Scope, timing, deliverables, and price are agreed in writing before work begins.
No. The request button opens an email draft. There is no public checkout on this page and no charge is created.
Do not send credentials by email. Any private-source review requires a separately agreed, read-only transfer process.
No. Payment does not buy coverage, placement, a favorable conclusion, or inclusion in the Registry.
No. It is decision support based on captured source and available evidence, not certification or a guarantee against future vulnerabilities.