← Back to PayloadsProgramming2026-04-15
Write less code , stacked PRs , bugs on the Moon
The discourse around AI-assisted programming often advocates for a
balanced approach: using AI for tedious tasks while developers
personally
craft ...
Quick Access
Install command
$ mrt install programming

**TL;DR** - Writing less code becoming deliberate engineering strategy; stacked PRs reduce review friction; economics of building for the Moon.
The 10-Second Pitch
- Elite engineering teams deliberately writing less code by using AI to handle boilerplate and patterns
- Stacked PRs (small, dependent commits) reduce cognitive load on code reviewers and improve review quality
- Building for Moon (or Mars) requires rethinking every assumption about compute, power, and fault tolerance
Setup in 3 Steps
1. Challenge your team assumption that more code equals more value - refactor for deletability, not just functionality
2. Implement stacked PRs using tools like Graphite or linear.app if doing code review at scale
3. Study NASA software standards for space deployments - most rigorous reliability requirements in existence
**Example Prompt:**
Design a code review process using stacked PRs and AI pre-review to reduce reviewer cognitive load.
Verdict
| Pros | Cons |
|---|
| Writing less code is a legitimate strategy | Maintenance burden does not disappear when you use AI |
| Stacked PRs genuinely improve review quality | Stacked PRs require tooling investment |
|---|
| Space software standards worth studying | Most teams do not have NASA reliability requirements |
Best code is code you did not write. Second best code is code that is easy to delete.